by Dr Rajpal Lamba BHMS,MD (Home) and homeopathy ebook free download homeopathic medicine in hindi list homeopathic medicine in hindi homeopathic. Homeopathy Practice Book Hindi book. Read 4 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. Best Homeopathy Books in kipentoriber.gaathic Medicine . होम्योपैथिक दवाएं [रोग एवं उपचार]! यह app हिंदी में है. Homeopathic Medicines [Treatment by Homeopathy]. This app is in Hindi. Homeopathy is.

Homeopathic Medicine Book In Hindi

Language:English, French, Arabic
Genre:Academic & Education
Published (Last):02.01.2016
ePub File Size:22.70 MB
PDF File Size:14.34 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Registration needed]
Uploaded by: JULIANNA

Treatment Guideline for Homoeopathic Medicine. Founder of Homoeopathy. Dr. Christian Fredrich Samuel Hahnemann. (). Items 1 - 10 of 74 Homeopathy Books like Organon, Bach Flower Remedies, DOHON MEIN HOMOEOPATHIC MATERIA MEDICA SAR SANGRAH (HINDI). homeopathic materia medica medicine Book in hindi pdf homeo book | Ayurvedic Books In Hindi pdf Allopathic Books in Hindi pdf Herbal.

Partha Sarathi rated it did not like it Feb 02, Ck rated it it was ok Nov 13, Shankar Sharma rated it liked it Sep 22, Tajuddin rated it did not like it Nov 10, Apdinesh rated it liked it Nov 13, Rohitash Kumar rated it it was amazing Apr 15, Pallavi rated it it was amazing Jul 08, Raj Kishor rated it it was ok Feb 21, Tahirhusain Husain rated it it was ok Mar 07, Amrish Giri Goswami rated it it was amazing Apr 21, Rjabhishek rated it liked it Dec 10, Alex rated it really liked it May 16, Sundaram Thiagarajan rated it it was amazing Apr 06, Mohd Fahad rated it really liked it Oct 10, Deepak rated it it was amazing Sep 19, Satish rated it it was amazing Nov 16, Prem rated it it was amazing Apr 18, Shubhamraj rated it it was ok Dec 15, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.

About Rajpal Lamba. Rajpal Lamba. While some may have demonstrated an effect greater than a placebo, overall the number of participants in the 17 trials was too small to permit any conclusions about the effectiveness of any given treatment for a specific condition.

This is not surprising. The basic principles of homeopathy, laid down by Samuel Hahnemann in the late s diseases are a manifestation of a "psora" or suppressed itch, the smaller the dose the greater the effect have no demonstrable relationship with each other or with what we know about human biology.

The only people for whom it could be said to "work" are hard-pressed GPs, who can pass their more persistent and intractable patients on to an "alternative" practioner, safe in the knowledge that no great harm is likely to be done. The best detailed critique of homeopathy is probably still Homeopathy and its Kindred Delusions, first delivered as two lectures by Oliver Wendell Holmes in Michael Hutton, Camberwell, London SE5 There are several levels of evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy, which has the best research profile of the alternative medical systems.

Thoughtlessly disregarded by the scientific community is so-called "anecdotal evidence", the best of which includes reports of clinical experience by homeopathic doctors who have used conventional methods with less success.


Taken together, this material suggests to a fair-minded observer that something interesting is taking place. Secondly, there is some good-quality historical evidence, particularly the experience of the American and European homeopathic hospitals in the 19th century, where mortality from infectious diseases like cholera was markedly lower than in conventional hospitals. In the modern period, the Society of Homeopaths has published reports on the work of members in primary care groups in the UK.

Most importantly, a significant body of scientific literature, mainly reports of clinical trials, has accumulated over the past 20 years or so. Four meta-analyses have been published, and the broad agreement is that homeopathic medicines work well. Where there is still a lack of clarity is the question of how they work. Not that a lack of understanding of mechanism ever stopped drugs and therapies being introduced into orthodox medicine. Dr Denis MacEoin, Chairman,, The Natural Medicines Society Newcastle upon Tyne Alan Crook's answer is misleading in the extreme, giving the impression that there is a well understood and widely accepted physical basis for homeopathic medicine.

This is simply not true. Fritz-Albert Popp has published some 76 papers from on extremely weak light emission from living systems. A few other authors have published similar work. It has no discernable relevance to homeopathy, and the physical mechanisms are routine: papers cite Popp's work, and just three of them mention homeopathy in their titles or abstracts. Jacques Benveniste's result has never been reliably replicated, and there is no explanation of it consistent with modern physics.

The "American Technologies Group" does not appear to publish its results in standard scientific journals, and the supposed explanations regarding "electromagnetic energy" and the like use scientific parlance in an essentially meaningless way. The explanation regarding "ice crystals" is anything but credible in conventional scientific terms. But if an analysis of the literature or scientific data do not convince you of the implausibility of homeopathy, let's try a little common sense.

The glass of water I drank with my supper has had innumerable substances dissolved in it during its history, many toxic, coloured or strong tasting. Curiously it was colourless, tasteless, and did me no harm.

Prof Harvey Rutt, Highfield, Southampton Isn't it strange how reading less about homeopathy makes one feel better? It struck me that this might indeed be a homeopathic effect, so I performed an experiment and cut out the two replies from the homeopathists, screwed them up and chucked them into the wastepaper basket.

When I examined the hole where they had been in G2 I found, to my astonishment, that their meaning remained imprinted upon the very molecules of the atmosphere!

And the meaning was that homeopathy is a load of wind. Dick Bentley, Southampton I was saddened to learn that homeopathy doesn't work. Tablets from the vet made her groggy but didn't stop her emptying the contents of her stomach. A friend recommended a homeopathic remedy which we now give her before each journey, and no more sickness. Now how do I tell her that it doesn't work and it's obviously been all in her mind?

Caroline Dearden, York Proponents, despite the discredited efforts of Jacques Benveniste, are facing a century of solid thermodynamics - experimental, calculational and theoretical - which defies their explanations.

This is not to say that homeopathy doesn't work, but no solution chemist will take the idea seriously until a homeopathist shows, by accepted method, how a solute-stabilised water envelope, one of Alan Crook's "crystals", can reform after the escape of its stabilising molecule. The tools are available and in daily use; the event has not occurred while anyone was looking. In addition, drinking water nowadays contains trace amounts of literally thousands of pollutants all of which should be exerting homeopathic effects.

Wet chemistry being no respecter of human values, if homeopathy worked as described, one might expect us all to be dead. The conventional answer then was aggressive steroid treatment which carried some risks so my wife suggested the alternative of homeopathy.

She was far from convinced and I was frankly sceptical but we found a local NHS doctor who also practised as a homeopath and he prescribed a dose of something very dilute. The result was astounding. The blue, wheezing toddler turned pink within minutes, became able to breath and would usually drop into peaceful sleep. The effect was, in scientific terms, decisive, observable and entirely repeatable. Placebo effects, in this case, are as unconvincing an explanation as anything else I have read in 25 years.

Like Prof Harvey Rutt I find the ideas of water memory and enormous dilution apparently risible - but the corollary of this is to find a better explanation, not to damn homeopathy as impossible.

As Lavoisier, Pasteur and so many others understood, good science always fits the hypothesis to the evidence. History is littered with tales of the arrogant and the foolish who have preferred the easier route of reversing that logic or who have denied that something happens simply because they can't explain why it does.

Chris Woolf, Liskeard, Cornwall If 'water memory' is real then it should apply to all soluble chemicals, not just those with medicinal effects. All experimental sources of error such as the placebo effect can therefore be eliminated by studying a simple system where clear-cut effects are visible.

I took a blue dye and diluted it fold. Its absorbance of light also decreased fold.


Therefore, no memory of the dye molecules was impressed on the water. If homeopathy only works for medicines, then an alternative explanation than water memory needs to be found. Tim Vickers, Dundee, UK Yes there is - the results of all the homeopathic medicine provings over the past years are recorded in the volumes of books called Materia Medica.

If you want the proof for yourself and you are feeling brave and perhaps foolish then do a proving. download a bottle of Belladona 30c and take a dose one tablet and wait an hour or so to see if you get a fever, if not repeat several times until you do so. A note of warning - stop as soon as you start to get any symptoms or strange sensations as Belladona is known to cause hot, pulsating headaches with a high fever.

It is antidoted by string coffee and camphor. If these fail to relieve then visit a homeopath. There is no evidence whatsoever that homeopathy works because it doesn't. It doesn't have a mechanism of action and if it did work, it would be quite easy to prove via double blind trials. If the concept of increased strength by dilution worked, all water in a lake or from the tap would have the magical powers of fish poop.

It's foolish and illogical. It doesn't do anything except make people money. Ben Wood, Chicago USA There is indeed evidence that homeopathy works: A recent Swiss government's 'Health Technology Assessment' report was the most comprehensive review to date of any governmental body on the scientific evidence on homeopathic medicine.

The conclusion is that homeopathy is both efficatious and cost effective Bornhoft and Matthiessen, There are many medical practices such as acupuncture that we don't understand the mechanism for, but they clearly work even for analgesia in operations. There are no double blind trials for most surgical procedures or for most vaccinations.

Your suggestion that homeopathy is just a dilution displays a high degree of ignorance of the the subject. Homeopathic medicines are never made just by a process of dilution. They are both diluted and succussed - energy is banged into the medicine at every potency. At the highest potencies it is true that the medicine might be as dilute a one drop in a lake, but a huge amound of energy has also been imparted. Dilution on its own doesn't work and isn't homeopathic.

Greg Meanwell, Totnes, UK In Constantine Hering, a bright allopathic German doctor set about writing the book that would finish off this new 'foolish and illogical' system.

To his great credit he followed the logical sequence of actions required to do a proving of Cinchona contains quinine and to his amazement found that the medicine gave him the symptoms of malaria, just as Hanhemann had explained. Hering became the founding father of homeopathy in America. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There are so many homeopaths and their patients who have tasted the pudding. If you want to prove whether it works or not, rather than just talking about it, do a proper proving over several hours as Hering did Greg Meanwell, Totnes, UK Greg I'm afraid that you have failed to think critically when making your points above.

The infamous "Swiss Government" report on homeopathy is nothing of the sort, it is not even by the Swiss Government, it was prepared for them and is not at all impartial. It has been thoroughly discredited and certainly does not support the notion that homeopathy works. What energy? How much energy?

You might also like: MATH SHORT TRICK IN HINDI PDF

What is this "energy" supposed to be doing? Apart from the kinetic energy imparting a marginal increase in the temperature of the solution, no "energy" that can be detected by science will be "added".

Supporters and believers in homeopathy really should stop making stuff up in order to support their beliefs. Next you'll be trying to drag in quantum mechanics and other areas of science that you don't understand to support your position.

Homeopathy cannot work, if it did we would have to re-write the book on physics and chemistry. In addition, when one looks at meta-analysis and Cochrane reviews of homeopathy's performance in clinical trials there is NO evidence of any effect beyond placebo. That is not cherry picking the occasional positive results, which is what homeopathy supporters do.

Positive results will happen every now and then through chance. Just looking at those results presents a skewed picture and is not scientific. Any fair minded person would accept that we should look at ALL the available evidence.

That is what Cochrane reviews do. Belief something with no evidence is a "faith" position. And that is what belief in homeopathy is.

It has no basis in science and cannot have the effects that its supporters claim for it. In my youth, I used to ridicule my cousin who was a homeopath giving all the scientific arguments against it. Except for those of high quality, all experiments should be repeated using stricter methodology and standardization before they are accepted as indications of special features of homeopathic potencies.


Vickers AJ. Independent replication of pre-clinical research in homoeopathy: a systematic review. Forschende Komplementarmedezin. A critical element in establishing the truth of a hypothesis in science is being able to reproduce the results of an experiment.

If only a believer in an idea can get it to work in a scientific study, that is a strong indication of bias. This review of the research intended to support the basic principles of homeopathy concluded that such replication has not been accomplished despite over a century of research in the field: There is a lack of independent replication of any pre-clinical research in homoeopathy.

In the few instances where a research team has set out to replicate the work of another, either the results were negative or the methodology was questionable.

One of the few studies published in the mainstream medical literature concerning ultradilute homeopathic remedies, published in Nature in , purported to show that such a remedy could influence the degranulation of human basophils. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE.

Because the findings were so revolutionary, the journal took the unprecedented step of arranging for an independent team of investigators to observe replications of the experiment. This team found that the results had been generated by an unblinded technician, and when this individual was unaware of the treatment given to each sample, the positive findings disappeared. Maddox, J. Randi, J. Stewart, W. Nature ; We conclude that the claims made by Davenas et al.

Our conclusion, not based solely on the circumstance that the only strictly doubleblind experiments we had witnessed proved to be failures, may be summarized as follows: The care with which the experiments reported have been carried out does not match the extraordinary character of the claims made in their interpretation. The phenomena described are not reproducible, but there has been no serious investigation of the reasons. The data lack errors of the magnitude that would be expected, and which are unavoidable.

No serious attempt has been made to eliminate systematic errors, including observer bias. The climate of the laboratory is inimical to an objective evaluation of the exceptional data. Subsequently, multiple attempts by independent researchers to replicate the original experiment also failed to find an effect. A review published in a homeopathy journal in concluded that after twenty years of research, it was still impossible to determine conclusively that purported effects of ultradilute solutions on human basophils were not due solely to artifact.

Ennis, M. Basophil models of homeopathy: a sceptical view. Homeopathy ;99 1 —Throughout the 19th century, dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States, [60] and by , there were 22 homeopathic colleges and 15, practitioners in the United States. In homeopathy, a solution that is more dilute is described as having a higher "potency", and more dilute substances are considered by homeopaths to be stronger and deeper-acting.

Curiously it was colourless, tasteless, and did me no harm. There was no trace of a single wart whereas half of my face was filled with these warts the previous night. Out of frustration, I bough sulpher CM, the so-called highest potency and took a dose. This is not to say that homeopathy doesn't work, but no solution chemist will take the idea seriously until a homeopathist shows, by accepted method, how a solute-stabilised water envelope, one of Alan Crook's "crystals", can reform after the escape of its stabilising molecule.

I've been given homeopathic medication that is supposed to be taken for 6 months, and it's 2 months now and I have yet to feel the difference. Rakesh rated it it was amazing Jul 16, They were forbidden from consuming coffee, tea, spices, or wine for the duration of the experiment; playing chess was also prohibited because Hahnemann considered it to be "too exciting", though they were allowed to drink beer and encouraged to exercise in moderation.

Related Categories.

THEDA from Ocala
Feel free to read my other articles. I have only one hobby: seven-ball. I love reading comics knowledgeably.